🚨BREAKING:
FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the… pic.twitter.com/HWYkkZLpoJ
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) March 22, 2024
Full Text:
FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.
This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.
Thank you @BoydenGrayPLLC for your excellent counsel. @drpaulmarik1 @RobertApter1 @Covid19Critical
(…) Last year, Doctors Mary Talley Bowden, Paul Marik, & Robert Apter appeared in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of their lawsuit.
“The FDA is not your doctor. Yesterday we took them to court to remind them of that,” Dr. Bowden wrote.
“A pharmacist cites CDC and US FDA as why she will continue to deny filling prescriptions for ivermectin. On Tuesday, the FDA’s attorney declared the FDA has no problem with doctors prescribing ivermectin off-label. It’s time for them to make a formal announcement and set the record straight,” Bowden wrote on Thursday.
During the oral argument, Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA stated that the agency “explicitly recognizes” that doctors do have the authority to administer ivermectin to treat COVID.
“”FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,” said Honold.
“FDA made these statements in response to multiple reports of consumers being hospitalized, after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses, which is available for purchase over the counter without the need for prescription,” Honold said.
“In some contexts, those words could be construed as a command,” Ms. Honold said. “But in this context, where FDA was simply using these words in the context of a quippy tweet meant to share its informational article, those statements do not rise to the level of a command.”
“FDA is clearly acknowledging that doctors have the authority to prescribe human ivermectin to treat COVID. So they are not interfering with the authority of doctors to prescribe drugs or to practice medicine,” she said.
It can be recalled that Houston Methodist launched an investigation into Bowden and suspended her for defying health authorities and exercising free speech.
The hospital excoriated Bowden for “using her social media accounts to express her personal opinions about the COVID-19 vaccine and treatments,” NBC News reports. The suspension barred the physician from admitting or treating patients at the hospital.
Bowden repeatedly warned that it is “wrong” to mandate the experimental mRNA vaccines and continuously touted Ivermectin as a safe and effective treatment amid threats from public health officials against prescribing the drug.
Bowden was forced to resign. In her resignation letter, Bowden doubled down on the efficacy of Ivermectin.
“I have worked hard to provide early treatment for victims of COVID-19. My efforts have been successful. I have treated more than 200 COVID-19 patients, including many with co-morbidities, and none of these patients have required hospitalization. This is a testament to the success of my treatment methods,” she wrote. “Throughout this pandemic, there has been no FDA-approved treatment for COVID. Therefore I have done my best to care for patients and save lives in the absence of a clear scientific consensus.”
“Early treatment must still be part of any strategy for patient care. That is why physicians and hospitals should pay more attention to medications such as Ivermectin, which significant research and my clinical experience indicate is effective,” she continued. “I have decided to part ways with Houston Methodist because of the accusation that I have been spreading “dangerous information.” This is false and defamatory. I do not spread misinformation, and my opinions are supported by science. There is substantial evidence for the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating COVID-19, and no evidence for serious or fatal side effects associated with the doses used to treat COVID-19.”
(Read more: Gateway Pundit, 3/22/2024) (Archive)
Comments:
They had to mock every other treatment option to get the vaccine mandates. Follow the money. pic.twitter.com/7OGuo1CMIH
— Blame Soros | America Last | Get Used to It (@Jude_62) March 22, 2024
. @US_FDA humanity will hold you accountable for the millions of deaths worldwide for willfully and deliberately blocking safe early treatments so @pfizer and @NIH could get an EUA for mRNA and the lethal Remdesivir drug that was pulled from the trial. https://t.co/Xfb379ciGH
— Truth Justice ™ (@SpartaJustice) March 22, 2024
Did they clear this with Carville, Podesta and Begala? pic.twitter.com/F2WC3uEtUB
— The Honker (@Honker0) March 22, 2024
https://t.co/yuR6aqDZbk pic.twitter.com/LDMhrrdjuN
— Jikkyleaks 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) March 22, 2024
Dr. David Martin: Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin took bribe from Tenet Health leading to mandate of dangerous experimental mRNA COVID-19 vaccine on military personnel.
DOD Lloyd Austin “Acted as a colluding commercial co-conspirator and received stock incentives for doing so” pic.twitter.com/lVb8obG7R8
— Steven Miller, MD, PhD (@SageListener) March 22, 2024
GREAT NEWS!!! pic.twitter.com/KMZt7B9c7z
— TXIND1836⭐️ (@txind1836) March 22, 2024
Kylie Wagstaff would be smiling at this 🔥 https://t.co/0LUUWqWU1h
— Humanspective (@Humanspective) March 22, 2024
It’s starting to look like this is the year of accountability. #2024Accountability
Now it’s time to bring accountability to leadership who overstepped their authority and coerced Americans to take unlicensed EUA products.https://t.co/0FWjSSGeyX pic.twitter.com/fQVBv68F9N
— Joshua Hoppe (@JHippityHoppe) March 22, 2024