Let’s not forget: Hillary’s private server held 47 emails with CIA info—vulnerable to foreign adversaries. Democrats rallied to her defense. To this day, they say she did nothing wrong. Spare us the outrage now. pic.twitter.com/qIHs6LxSV0
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) March 26, 2025
— Wayne Dunlap (@wdunlap) March 27, 2025
HRC used Bleach Bit to wipe her servers and took a hammer to her cell phones. Let’s not even get started on Seth Rich. pic.twitter.com/CxY5FAXCBl
— BelleMorte (@Belleisoverthis) March 27, 2025
From The Washington Times:
Two watchdog groups, Judicial Watch and Cause of Action, had sued in 2015 demanding the government recover all of Mrs. Clinton’s emails, saying she violated open-records laws by not preserving her messages.
👉 U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg, though, said the FBI did what it could, and did manage to recover thousands of messages Mrs. Clinton didn’t return herself.
“Those efforts went well beyond the mine-run search for missing federal records … and were largely successful, save for some emails sent during a two-month stretch. Even then, the FBI pursued every imaginable avenue to recover the missing emails,” wrote Judge Boasberg, an Obama appointee to the court.
❕Originally, the case had been dismissed as moot, but last year the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed that finding, ordering the government to “shake loose a few more emails.”
👉 But Judge Boasberg put an end to the shaking Thursday.
“The Court of Appeals may have asked the Government to ’shak[e] the tree harder’ for more emails, but it never suggested that the FBI must shake every tree in every forest, without knowing whether they are fruit trees,” he wrote.
The judge said the FBI had already uncovered 55,000 pages of emails when it was ordered to do more. The agency interviewed people that most frequently exchanged work related emails with Mrs.
From The Washington Times:
Two watchdog groups, Judicial Watch and Cause of Action, had sued in 2015 demanding the government recover all of Mrs. Clinton’s emails, saying she violated open-records laws by not preserving her messages.
👉 U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg,… pic.twitter.com/pKELnw9ZK0
— The Swine Parrot (@TheSwineParrot) March 26, 2025
🚨 WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails until after the 2016 election
He’s also now “coincidentally” presiding over the Signal case
This is RIGGED! How do… pic.twitter.com/9mRpZ7zY2p
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 26, 2025
The courts are NOT following the law. The appearance of impropriety is the foundation for credibility in our justice system and it is being abjectly ignored. The courts continually interpret 28 USC 455 more broadly so they can cover for biased judges but there are limits and I… pic.twitter.com/W97nUrIpGI
— Tom Renz (@RenzTom) March 27, 2025
Boasberg’s emergency Signalgate hearing was prompted by an unsubstantiated claim that Trump advisors used auto-delete to destroy records.
So far, there’s been no discovery, no FBI investigation, no authenticated witness testimony or even any verified sources… pic.twitter.com/Q9Jny3MKHa
— Crowdsource The Truth (@JG_CSTT) March 28, 2025
(Timeline editor’s note: Be sure to check Boasberg’s timeline tag below to read more about his lawless justice for the past several years.)