“How Van Grack’s misrepresentations about the Flynn investigation and evidence led Judge Sullivan to issue an inaccurate opinion.
Why a show-cause hearing is appropriate.
Van Grack told Judge Sullivan that the Flynn “lies” “impeded” and “had a material impact on” the Trump/Russia investigation.
Van Grack also told Judge Sullivan that he had provided all Brady evidence – and all “information that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing.”
Van Grack to Judge Sullivan:
The govt has provided all Brady Evidence.
The government has not “suppressed evidence.”
(All this turned out to be false.)
AG Barr explains in greater detail:
They kept the Flynn investigation open “for the express purpose of trying to catch, lay a perjury trap for General Flynn.”
Van Grack’s misrepresentations are serious and should be dealt with.
Not only violate Sullivan’s Brady order and deny Flynn what was due…
But he induced Judge Sullivan to reach conclusions now contradicted by the evidence.